Wednesday, October 30, 2013
Tuesday Write #7
To the boys on the island, in the book The Lord of the Flies by William Golding, the conch was a symbol of civilization. When the boys first found the conch they used it as an object of authority when it was decided that the only person to speak at the time was the one with the conch in hand. “I’ll give the conch to the next person to speak. He can hold it when he’s speaking.” However, many of the rebellious boys saw the conch as a worthless item, so they just blurted out statements when they pleased. By having the conch in hand, one would be the only to talk which represents order and law in civilization. Without the conch many of the boys turned to chaos and anarchy. When the conch along with Piggy were killed and destroyed it symbolized the death of civilization and reason. “The conch exploded into a thousand white fragments and ceased to exist.”
Wednesday, October 23, 2013
The Hunger Games Book Review
Suzanne Collin’s “The Hunger Games”
Reviewed by Alex Intravaia
A country governed by corrupt leaders, a world where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. A country where for some it is a struggle to find scraps of food while the rich eat until they are stuffed and cannot eat anymore. This is the country known as Panem, the aftermath of the downfall of the United States.

I enjoyed reading this science fiction adventure novel. There were many suspenseful scenes and relatable characters. “The world transformed to flame and smoke. Burning branches crack from trees and fall is showers of sparks at my feet” (172). As I read the book it did a great job of making it feel like I was actually in the arena by using vivid description and intense action. Although the book was very well written, it did have some weak points. For example, there were a lot of words that may be unfamiliar to readers. “We walk toward the seam in silence” (12).

Collin’s writing style really shined in this book. Her use of diction made you feel connected to certain characters and feel as though you were in the book. Her use of flashbacks were very interesting and added a lot of depth to the story. The only criticism I can give on the writing is the fact that some scenes were very descriptive and were well thought out while some scenes where just simple glances and were just passed over, this is noticeable when passing the nights and even whole days.

Tuesday, October 15, 2013
Malcolm Gladwell Blog Response
In Malcolm Gladwell’s chapter of The Warring Harding Error
it surprised me that so many people based good leadership on exterior aesthetics.
It surprises me even more that people encouraged Warren Harding to run for
president even though he stated that he was not interested in it. “He was, most
historians agree, one of the worst presidents in American history,” (Gladwell).
Harding had the physical attributes of a good leader but as it turns out his
intelligence of leadership lacked because most agree he was a terrible
president. The message that I see in this chapter is the classic ‘Don’t judge a
book by its cover’.
This chapter is very useful in a discussion of leadership because
you can point out what you would not like in a leader. Harding was physically
strong and good-looking, which is naturally good traits of a leader, but there
is also a second part of the leader equation that also needs to be filled. The
second half is intelligence of a leader. The leader needs to be considerate and
make the best decisions for the public. When only looking at half of the leader
traits and making a decision we are creating unconscious biases. Fixing these
biases is very easy because all you need to do is identify it and work towards
adjusting the behavior towards it.

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)